← Common Core coursesBMS 114 · General Microbiology I
BMS 114 · Common Core (Tronc commun)Section 7.1 · Immunity
Section 28 of 33

The immune system and its properties

Explain where the word immunity comes from, what the immune system defends, and why distinguishing self from non-self is the property from which every other mechanism follows.

New to this course? How each section works
  1. Learn gives you one short idea at a time. Each idea starts with a single sentence, then explains it, gives an example, and asks you a small question you can answer straight away.
  2. Explore shows a diagram of the same ideas. Click the numbered parts to read what each one is.
  3. Check asks a few questions. Answer them all correctly to finish the section and unlock the next one.
  4. “Go deeper” is optional. It adds mechanism and extra detail for when you are ready — nothing you need for the checks is hidden there.
Why this matters

Every vaccine you will ever give, every infection that resolves on its own, every transplant that is accepted or rejected, and every autoimmune disease you will nurse rests on one ability: the body must know which molecules are its own and which are not. Once you hold that distinction, the rest of immunity stops looking like a list of cells and starts looking like a single logical system. This section gives you that frame before you meet the mechanisms, and it defines the vocabulary — antigen, antibody, epitope, hapten, adjuvant, complement — that later sections use without stopping to explain.

What you need to know first

No prior immunology is assumed. You only need the meaning of microorganism, pathogen and infection from Unit 1, plus one idea from ordinary language: that a body can tell its own tissue from something foreign, the way a household recognises its own members. Technical words are defined when they first matter, here or in the key terms.

Words to know (6)
Antigen
Any molecule that the immune system is able to recognise. It may come from outside the body, such as a bacterial protein, or from the body itself, such as a tumour protein. Recognition, not harmfulness, is what makes a molecule an antigen. The measles virus surface protein and a pollen protein are both antigens, and so is a protein made by a cancer cell.
Antibody (immunoglobulin)
A Y-shaped protein made by a B lymphocyte that binds tightly and specifically to one antigen. Binding may neutralise the target directly or mark it so that other cells and proteins destroy it. Antibodies against tetanus toxin are what make a tetanus vaccine protective.
Immunogenicity
The capacity of a substance to provoke an immune response, not merely to be noticed by it. A molecule can be recognised without being immunogenic; immunogenicity is about whether a full response is triggered. A large foreign protein is usually strongly immunogenic; a tiny molecule such as penicillin is not immunogenic on its own.
Epitope
The small, precise part of an antigen that an antibody or a lymphocyte receptor actually touches. One antigen usually carries several different epitopes, so several different antibodies can bind the same molecule. A single viral protein may carry five or six separate epitopes, each recognised by its own clone of B cells.
Hapten and carrier
A hapten is a small molecule that cannot start an immune response by itself. When it becomes chemically attached to a large protein carrier, the hapten–carrier complex is immunogenic and antibody against the small molecule appears. Penicillin behaves as a hapten: it binds to body proteins, and the resulting complex can cause a sudden allergic reaction.
Adjuvant and complement
An adjuvant is a substance added to a vaccine to make the immune response stronger and longer. Complement is a set of about thirty blood proteins that work in a cascade to punch holes in microbes and to flag them for destruction. Aluminium salts are the adjuvant used in many routine vaccines; complement proteins coat a bacterium so phagocytes engulf it more easily.
One idea at a timeIdea 1 / 7

In one sentence Immunity comes from the Latin immunis, meaning exempt, and was adopted to name the natural protection a survivor of measles or smallpox keeps against that disease.

Immunity began as a legal word for exemption

In Rome, immunis described a person free of a public duty or a tax. Medicine borrowed the word because the same shape fits: an immune person is exempt from a disease they have already met. The observation is ancient: a survivor of measles or smallpox did not catch it again. The notes give exactly this history. Notice what kind of thing immunity is, because beginners misplace it. It is a state of the body, not an anatomical part, and it is specific to the disease that produced it.

For example

A grandmother who nursed children through a measles epidemic as a girl does not catch measles from her grandchild, because she is immune to that one virus.

Pause and check yourself

A patient asks whether being immune to measles means they cannot catch tuberculosis. What is the correct reply?

Show the answer

No. Naturally acquired immunity is specific: meeting the measles virus leaves protection against measles, not against the tubercle bacillus. The word comes from a legal idea of exemption, and the exemption applies only to the disease that produced it, which is why vaccination is given separately for each disease.

Read detailed explanations
Cells, tissues and organs: where immune cells are made, mature and meet the antigen

The notes say the immune system is a network of cells, tissues and organs, and that each of the two systems has both cellular and humoral components, but they never say where any of it happens. That geography explains most of the vocabulary you will meet later. All the cells of both systems begin as haematopoietic stem cells in the red bone marrow. From there the pathways separate. Neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, mast cells and dendritic cells mature in the marrow and are released into the blood ready to act; they are the cellular effectors of innate immunity. Lymphocytes follow a different route. Those that mature in the bone marrow become B lymphocytes; those that travel as immature cells to the thymus, a gland behind the sternum, and are educated there become T lymphocytes. Marrow and thymus are therefore called primary lymphoid organs, because they are the sites where lymphocytes are produced and become functional.

Where lymphocytes meet antigen. The secondary lymphoid organs are the lymph nodes stationed along lymphatic vessels, the spleen filtering blood, and the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue of the tonsils, the intestinal wall and the airways. This is why a sore, swollen lymph node during an infection is a sign of activity rather than a new disease: lymphocytes are proliferating there in response to antigen delivered from the tissues.

Cellular and humoral: two ways of delivering protection. Humoral immunity means the protective factors dissolved in blood and other body fluids — antibody made by B lymphocytes that have become plasma cells, and the complement proteins. Cellular immunity means protection delivered by cells themselves: T lymphocytes that kill an infected cell on contact, and phagocytes that engulf. The innate system has its own versions of both: the cellular side is the phagocyte and the natural killer cell — a lymphocyte that kills infected cells without recognising one specific antigen — and the humoral side is complement, lysozyme in tears and saliva, interferons and antimicrobial peptides such as defensins.

Four ways immunity is acquired, and nurses explain them to families every day. Active immunity means the person’s own system did the work; it appears after about one to two weeks and lasts years or a lifetime. Passive immunity means ready-made antibody was transferred; it works immediately but fades within weeks or months because no memory was made. Natural active immunity follows an infection, natural passive immunity is the mother’s IgG crossing the placenta or IgA in breast milk, artificial active immunity is vaccination, and artificial passive immunity is an injection of antibody or antitoxin, given after a snakebite or a tetanus-prone wound. This distinction is the reason a newborn is protected against measles for the first months of life and then becomes susceptible, and the reason a post-exposure injection can protect today without protecting next year.

Cooperation, not sequence: how the innate system starts and shapes the adaptive response

The labels first line and second line suggest two relays handing over a baton, and the notes themselves warn that the innate and adaptive systems have separate functions but a relationship, and that they differ in a number of ways. The relationship is closer than a handover. Innate cells do not merely hold an infection until the adaptive system arrives; they decide whether an adaptive response happens at all, what kind it will be, and where. The mechanism has four named steps. First, recognition. Innate cells carry pattern-recognition receptors, such as the Toll-like receptors, which bind molecular motifs shared by whole classes of microbes rather than one species: lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negative outer membranes, peptidoglycan fragments, flagellin, and unmethylated CpG DNA. Because these patterns are conserved and essential to the microbe, the innate system recognises a broad category immediately, in minutes to hours, and the same receptor works against many different bacteria. The price of that breadth is that the receptor cannot distinguish one species from another with precision. Second, signalling. Engagement of those receptors makes the innate cell secrete cytokines, small soluble messengers, and chemokines that recruit more cells to the site. Interferons are cytokines made in response to viruses; they make neighbouring cells resistant to infection and activate natural killer cells. Interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor produce fever and the local signs of inflammation, which is why fever appears before any specific antibody exists. Third, antigen presentation. This is the hinge between the two systems. A dendritic cell that has captured antigen migrates to a lymph node and displays fragments of it on its major histocompatibility complex molecules to T lymphocytes, while also delivering the cytokine signals that came with the encounter. A T lymphocyte whose receptor happens to fit that peptide–MHC combination is selected and expands. Without this presentation step the adaptive system has no way of knowing that an invasion is under way; antigen alone, in the absence of innate signals, tends to produce tolerance rather than attack. Fourth, arming the response and the effector phase. Activated helper T lymphocytes in turn license B lymphocytes to become plasma cells and to switch the class of antibody they make, and they license cytotoxic T lymphocytes to kill infected cells. Meanwhile complement proteins opsonise microbes with C3b so phagocytes engulf them more efficiently, and antibody does the same through its Fc portion. The two systems also converge on the same target: an antibody-coated bacterium is destroyed by an innate phagocyte, and a virally infected cell marked by antibody is killed by an innate natural killer cell. The clinical consequence of this cooperation is that damage to one system disables the other. A patient with advanced HIV loses helper T lymphocytes, so the adaptive response cannot be organised and the innate system cannot be armed against organisms it could otherwise clear; this is why opportunistic infections such as pneumocystis pneumonia and tuberculosis appear. Conversely, a congenital defect of innate signalling leaves the adaptive system uninformed, so vaccination may fail to produce protective memory. Nursing practice touches the same junction from the other direction: a live vaccine cannot be given to a patient whose adaptive system is suppressed, and an inflammatory reaction at an injection site is the innate system reporting that the antigen was noticed.

What an antigen is at the molecular level, and why a hapten needs a carrier

The notes set antigen, immunogenicity, epitope, hapten, adjuvant and complement as an assignment without defining any of them, and the fourth property — any molecule capable of being recognised is considered an antigen — is only useful once you know what recognition physically involves. Recognition is shape and chemistry, not identity. An antibody binding site, called a paratope, is a pocket formed by a few loops of the immunoglobulin molecule, and it contacts roughly fifteen to twenty-two amino acid residues of the antigen in a space about the size of a small sugar. The contact is non-covalent: hydrogen bonds, ionic attraction, hydrophobic packing and van der Waals forces. Because each of these is weak, a useful bond requires many of them at once, which is exactly why binding depends on complementary shape over a small area and why a single amino acid change can abolish it. That small contacted area is the epitope. Epitopes come in two kinds. A linear epitope is a short run of consecutive residues, exposed when the protein is unfolded or digested; a conformational epitope is formed by residues brought together by the folded three-dimensional shape, and it disappears if the protein is denatured. This is not a technicality. It explains why antibody raised against a whole live virus may fail to bind that virus after it has been heat-killed or fixed in a test, and why some laboratory tests use intact organisms or native proteins rather than fragments. Chemically, the strongest antigens in nature are proteins, because they can present many different epitopes and can be processed into peptides for T lymphocytes; polysaccharides are also antigenic, which is how pneumococcal and meningococcal capsular vaccines work, and nucleic acids and lipids become antigenic mainly when bound to protein. Size and complexity matter: a molecule of about ten thousand daltons can be immunogenic under good conditions, and immunogenicity generally rises with molecular size, with the number of foreign epitopes, and with how different the molecule is from the host’s own proteins. Now the hapten problem follows directly. A molecule smaller than about a thousand daltons, such as penicillin, a nickel ion or a dinitrophenol group, simply cannot hold an antibody or a lymphocyte receptor with enough non-covalent contacts to trigger a response, and it also cannot be processed into peptides for T lymphocytes. On its own it is recognised weakly or not at all, so it is antigenic in principle but not immunogenic. If the same small molecule is covalently joined to a large protein, the carrier supplies what the hapten lacks: carrier epitopes that helper T lymphocytes can recognise, and the molecular bulk that makes the complex hold together long enough to be taken up by a dendritic cell. The result is antibody that binds the small molecule itself, because the paratope fits the hapten portion. Clinically this is the mechanism of drug allergy. Penicillin is too small to provoke a response, but it reacts with the amino groups of serum albumin and of cell-surface proteins, creating a hapten–carrier complex; some patients then make IgE against the penicillin epitope, and a subsequent dose triggers mast cell degranulation, urticaria and, in the worst case, anaphylaxis. Patch-test allergy to nickel works the same way, with skin proteins acting as carrier. Adjuvants exploit the other half of the same problem: even a large protein antigen given alone may fail to activate innate pattern-recognition receptors strongly enough to license a full adaptive response, so an adjuvant such as an aluminium salt or an oil-in-water emulsion supplies the danger signals, holds the antigen at the injection site so that dendritic cells can collect it, and recruits those cells. This is why the notes’ assignment matters beyond vocabulary: hapten and carrier explain drug allergy, adjuvant explains why vaccine formulations are not merely antigen in water, and epitope explains why immunity to one part of a microbe does not always protect against the whole of it.

Explore the diagram

Look at the whole drawing first. Then select one numbered part and connect it to the idea you just read.

Self or non-self: one recognition decision, two arms of the response

Read the plate downwards. The immune system first decides whether a molecule or cell is the body’s own; if it is not, the decision opens one of two response routes. The left route is innate and immediate, the right is adaptive and learned, and both carry a cellular and a humoral component. The lower band shows the two routes working together rather than one after the other.

New to diagrams? Read this first
  1. Look at the whole drawing once without clicking anything. Ask yourself only: what kind of picture is this (a comparison, a route, a sequence, a table)?
  2. Press Play, or use the arrows, to move through the numbered parts in order. The drawing stays still; only the highlight moves.
  3. Click a number, or its name in the list below, to read what that part is and why it matters. Use “Hide labels” when you want to test your memory.
More controls
100%

01 / 6The decision at the top

Self or non-self: one recognition decision, two arms of the responseRead the plate downwards. The immune system first decides whether a molecule or cell is the body’s own; if it is not, the decision opens one of two response routes. The left route is innate and immediate, the right is adaptive and learned, and both carry a cellular and a humoral component. The lower band shows the two routes working together rather than one after the other.The organising principle of the immune systemRecognition first, response second1 · Distinguish self from non-selfEvery molecule carries a molecular identityRead by receptors, in minutes or in daysSelf ornon-self?self or harmlessnon-selfNo attackTolerance of healthy self tissueResponse is mountedThe recognised moleculeis the antigen2 · Two arms clear itInnate and adaptive, both always workingInnate — first lineCellular: phagocytesHumoral: complementActs from the startNo memory of one antigenMinutes to hoursAdaptive — second lineCellular: T lymphocytesHumoral: antibodiesSlower on first meetingLong-lived, protects on re-exposureDays, then years of memory+3 · They cooperate, never take turnsInnate cells present antigen and release signalsAdaptive antibody then recruits innate killingOne weakened system disables the other4 · What the same machinery rejectsAbnormal host cells: tumoursGrafts, transfusions, allergens, drug haptens

If the drawing is wider than this panel, scroll it sideways. Labels stay readable; the numbered explanations below show the same ideas.

The decision at the top

The first property of the system is the ability to distinguish self from non-self, and everything below the decision node depends on it. Receptors read molecular identity rather than intent: nothing needs to be harmful, foreign or alive to be recognised, and anything recognised is called an antigen. Autoimmune disease is what happens when this reading fails and the body attacks its own tissue.

Schematic decision and comparison plate, not drawn to scale and not a timeline. The two arms are shown side by side for comparison, but they act at the same time; the notes themselves say that both function to protect against invading organisms and that a relationship exists between them. Tolerance of healthy self tissue is beyond the supplied notes, which describe only the elimination of non-self material.

Key points to remember

  • Immunity comes from the Latin immunis, meaning exempt, and names the protection a person keeps after meeting a disease such as measles or smallpox.
  • Immunology emerged from the golden age of microbiology: identifying agents came first, then prevention with killed or attenuated organisms or compounds extracted from them.
  • Immunity is the body’s protection against invasion by pathogenic microorganisms and against their harmful effects, and the immune system is a network of cells, tissues and organs.
  • The four properties are distinguishing self from non-self, eliminating harmful non-self material, destroying abnormal host cells, and treating anything recognised as an antigen.
  • The innate system is non-specific and without memory; the adaptive system is specific, long-lived and protects against re-exposure, and each has cellular and humoral components.
Go deeper

Worked example

Why a child needs two measles doses, and an adult needs a tetanus booster. A mother brings her nine-month-old baby for measles vaccination at a rural health centre. The child receives the first dose today, and the nurse explains that a second dose is needed later. The mother asks why one dose is not enough, and whether her own tetanus booster last year will protect her for life. You must answer using the properties of the immune system, not by quoting a schedule.

  1. Identify what has to be recognised. The vaccine introduces measles antigens — proteins the immune system can recognise — but it does not cause the disease. The first property of the system is now engaged: the antigens are non-self, so they are read as foreign even though they are given deliberately and in a safe form.
  2. Explain why the first dose is not always enough. The adaptive system does not respond fully the first time an antigen is met; it needs several days to expand the right clones of lymphocytes and to produce useful antibody. In a nine-month-old, antibody inherited from the mother may still be present and may blunt the vaccine antigens, and the response to a first dose is smaller than the response to a later one. This is why a second dose is scheduled and why coverage is judged on two doses, not one.
  3. Name what the second dose actually buys. The second exposure meets a system that already holds memory cells specific for the measles antigens. Those cells respond faster and in far greater numbers, so antibody of high quality appears quickly and protection becomes durable. This is the second line of defence doing exactly what the notes describe: affording protection against re-exposure to the same pathogen. A booster is therefore not a repeat of the same lesson but a revision of one already learned.
  4. Apply the same reasoning to tetanus in the adult. Tetanus vaccine contains a toxoid, an inactivated toxin, because the danger is the toxin and not the bacterium at the wound. Protection depends on circulating antibody that neutralises the toxin, and antibody levels fall slowly over the years, so periodic boosters maintain them. The mother should not assume that one booster lasts for life; she should follow the national schedule. Notice that the reasoning is identical for measles and for tetanus, even though one target is a virus and the other a toxin.

Both questions are answered by the same three properties: the system recognises non-self, it responds specifically, and it remembers. Vaccination works by supplying recognised non-self material safely so that memory is built without the disease. The dose number in a schedule is not an administrative detail; it is a direct consequence of how many times the adaptive system must meet an antigen before its memory is reliable.

Common misconception

The most common beginner error is to imagine that the immune system simply attacks everything foreign, so that stronger immunity always means better health. In fact the system is defined by recognition, and recognition is what makes a transplant, a pollen protein and a drug-metabolite complex into antigens whether or not they can harm anyone. A second error is to treat the innate and adaptive systems as two successive stages in which the first stops when the second begins. They overlap throughout: innate cells present antigen, release signals that shape the adaptive response and destroy antibody-coated targets. A third error is to read “no memory” as “no protection”.

Check your reasoning

Think of a person you know who received a vaccine or had an infectious disease. Working only from the four properties, write down what the immune system had to recognise, what it had to do, and what it must remember afterwards.

Reveal an answer

Take a completed hepatitis B vaccination series. The system had to recognise the surface antigen of the virus as non-self, even though it arrived as a purified vaccine protein rather than as a live infection. It then had to mount a specific response and produce antibody against that one antigen, and finally it had to keep memory cells that persist long after the antigen has cleared. Nothing needed to be pathogenic in order for immunity to be produced, which is why the fourth property — anything recognised is an antigen — is the one that makes vaccination possible at all.

Where this comes from

  • BMS 114 General Microbiology I lecture notes (supplied) · “Lecture notes twelve — introduction to immunology”, lines 1603–1665: the Latin origin of immunity, the pioneers, the immunisation examples, the definition of immunity, the human immune system, the four properties, the two parts of the system and the general knowledge list.
  • Beyond the supplied notes — vocabulary the notes set as an assignment · lines 1616–1617 set antigen, antibody, immunogenicity, epitope, hapten, adjuvant and complement as an assignment without defining them. The definitions in keyTerms and the molecular treatment of antigens, epitopes and haptens in the deeper topic follow standard immunology; the notes give the assignment at lines 1616–1617 and the recognition rule at line 1634 only.
  • Correction to the supplied notes — diseases said to be extinct · Correction to the supplied notes: lines 1612–1615 state that tetanus, measles, mumps, poliomyelitis and smallpox are now “either extinct or very rarely seen”. Only smallpox has been eradicated, declared so in 1980; the others are rare or nearly eliminated where immunisation is sustained but continue to circulate where coverage falls (WHO eradication and elimination programme status).
  • Beyond the supplied notes — cells, organs, active and passive immunity, and innate–adaptive cooperation · lines 1663–1664 state only that each system has cellular and humoral components and that a relationship exists. The primary and secondary lymphoid organs, the four ways immunity is acquired, and the recognition, cytokine, antigen-presentation and effector steps by which the innate system instructs the adaptive one are standard immunology.

Lesson progress is saved on this device for the current learner. Practice answers stay separate and are not stored.

About this course and its sources

Bilingual lessons organised from the supplied BMS 114 General Microbiology I lecture notes (Mr Ngotelo F. Ambene, Mr Lyonga B. Lyonga & Mr Fumbui Louis Ngong). Diagrams are original educational schematics; sections that correct the notes or go beyond them say so in their sources. Nursing and French-language review are pending.