In one sentence The arithmetic mean, or average, is the total of every observation divided by the number of observations, and it keeps the unit of the data.
The mean adds every observation and divides by how many there are
The arithmetic mean — the number most people simply call the average — is the total of all the observations divided by the number of observations. In words, the rule is: mean = total of every value ÷ n, where n is how many values there are. Statisticians write the sample mean as x̄, read “x bar”, which is just a short label for this calculation. The notes’ five pulse rates are 72, 80, 76, 84 and 78 beats per minute. Adding them gives 72 + 80 + 76 + 84 + 78 = 390. There are n = 5 observations, so the mean is 390 ÷ 5 = 78 beats per minute. Two things are worth noticing. First, the mean keeps the unit of the data: adding beats per minute and dividing by a pure count leaves beats per minute. Second, the total uses every value, so a single unusual measurement enters the answer and can pull it away from the rest of the group.
Five children weigh 18, 20, 22, 24 and 26 kg. The total is 110 kg, and 110 ÷ 5 = 22 kg, so the mean weight is 22 kg.
A ward records four morning temperatures: 37.0, 38.0, 38.5 and 40.5 °C. Work out the mean and state its unit.
Show the answer
The total is 37.0 + 38.0 + 38.5 + 40.5 = 154.0 °C. There are four observations, so the mean is 154.0 ÷ 4 = 38.5 °C. The unit is degrees Celsius, the same unit as the observations themselves.
Read detailed explanations
- Why the mean is a balance point, and how far one value moves it
Look again at the mean as a physical balance. Imagine the observations placed as equal weights along a ruler; the mean is the point where the ruler rests level, its centre of gravity. This picture explains the mechanism. Around the mean, the distances of the values below it exactly cancel the distances of the values above it: these signed distances, called deviations, always add to zero. That identity is not a coincidence but the defining property of the arithmetic mean, and it is why the mean responds to the size of a value and not merely to its presence. A single observation sitting far from the rest contributes a large deviation, and the balance point must shift to restore equilibrium. The size of that shift can be predicted without recalculating everything. When one new observation x joins a set of n values whose mean was m, the mean moves by exactly (x − m) ÷ (n + 1), because the total gains x while the count gains one. With n = 7, m = 78 and x = 140, the shift is (140 − 78) ÷ 8 = 7.75 beats per minute, exactly the movement seen in Tutorial 2. The formula also shows why larger samples resist a single rogue value: the same spike divided by a bigger denominator moves the mean less. The median has no such sensitivity, because it is a positional statistic rather than an algebraic sum; inserting a value only changes which positions are central, and the magnitude of an extreme observation can never enter the calculation. This is why a distribution contaminated by a few very large readings is summarised by the median, while the mean is reserved for data in which every observation fairly represents the group.
- Which average is legal? Levels of measurement and the shape of the data
The choice of average is not a matter of taste; it is constrained by the level of measurement of the variable and by the shape of its distribution. Nominal data are labels with no order — blood group, diagnosis, ward, marital status. Nothing can be added and nothing can be ranked, so the mean and the median are both undefined and the mode is the only permissible average. Ordinal data can be ranked, but the gaps between ranks are not equal — pain scored 0 to 10, an Apgar score, a satisfaction rating. The median is legitimate here because it uses only order, while the mean pretends that the step from 1 to 2 equals the step from 9 to 10. Interval and ratio data carry equal units, so all three measures are available, and the deciding factor becomes symmetry. In a symmetric distribution the mean and the median coincide, and the mean is preferred because it uses every observation. In a skewed distribution they separate, and the direction of the skew is readable from which one is larger: a long tail of high values — hospital charges, length of stay, viral load — drags the mean upward, so the mean exceeds the median; a long tail of low values, such as age at death in a neonatal unit, pulls the mean below the median. The rule for clinical reporting follows directly: use the mean with a symmetric variable, the median with a skewed one, and the mode with a category; and whenever the mean and the median differ appreciably, say so, because that disagreement is itself a finding about the data.
- Averaging grouped data: weighted means from a frequency table
Small sets can be listed one value at a time, but ward data are usually recorded in a frequency table, as in Section 4.3: a column of classes and a column showing how many patients fall into each. Listing sixty weights individually is unnecessary. When values repeat, or when they are grouped into intervals, the mean becomes a weighted mean: mean = Σ(f × x) ÷ Σf, where f is the frequency of a value and x is that value, or the midpoint of its class. The Greek capital letter Σ means “add up what follows”. Each value is multiplied by the number of times it occurs, those products are added, and the result is divided by the total number of observations. A worked example shows why the midpoint matters. Suppose 60 patients are grouped by weight as 40–49 kg with f = 5, 50–59 kg with f = 12, 60–69 kg with f = 20, 70–79 kg with f = 15 and 80–89 kg with f = 8. The midpoints are 44.5, 54.5, 64.5, 74.5 and 84.5 kg. The products are 222.5, 654, 1,290, 1,117.5 and 676, which total 3,960. Dividing by Σf = 60 gives a weighted mean of 66 kg, an approximation because every patient in a class is treated as if they sat at its midpoint. Two cautions follow. First, a grouped mean is always an estimate, and the true mean can be recovered only from the raw values. Second, the mode of grouped data is the class with the largest frequency, called the modal class — here 60–69 kg, with f = 20 — and not a single weight, because the individual weights are no longer visible. The same table yields the median through cumulative frequencies: find the class in which the running total first passes n ÷ 2 = 30, then interpolate within it.